As the world turns, liberals squirm, and the Democrats continue to elevate devoted liars to national prominence, I've jumped the gun here at the internet's most informative and insightful blog -- I actually have time to get another entry on the record ahead of Brother Paul, whom is presently consumed with ridding the fair city of Reno of what criminal element may lurk there. We can certainly anticipate good things from our distinguished hero -- by way of recipes and sound political insight -- in the days to come.
But, on to matters at hand. This is serious business for legitimate Americans of every race, creed, and origin.
If you haven't noticed the spectacular bias that exists in major American media outlets, you are 1) lucky, 2) an idiot, 3) one of those that doesn't believe such a bias exists. Let's focus on those of you in category #3 (since luck and moronic proclivities disqualify all those so adorned).
I'm going to use the fundamental tenets of journalism to make this case. For liberals and their enablers in the Democratic Party, those are: who, what, when, where, and how. I should also include -- with great emphasis -- the injection of established fact in any news report. There should be distinctions offered by media (legitimate Americans can make those easily): news (factual events presented within the template of journalistic fundamentals), opinion (editorial missives -- blogs, etc.), and entertainment (comics and crossword puzzles). Since many media outlets play host to liberal or left wing political views (those paid by that outlet to make the presentation), facts take a back seat to political agenda in the news department. We can, have, and will debunk, expose, and mutilate every liberal talking point (with relative ease) in this forum, but until enough legitimate Americans drop by to discover the brevity and factuality of these messages, we know the majority of news and information directed at them will contain incredible levels of liberal bias.
Rush Limbaugh's show is not news. The tremendous success of that program lies in his ability to comment on news and events. Rush does not retain the services of investigators and reporters, scouring the country for something to report. Thanks to the proliferation of internet news services (blogs, etc.), Rush Limbaugh, Matt Drudge, et. al. can add those to the stacks of mainstream media reports they are so keen to examine daily. From this wealth of information, Rush is able to concoct his incredibly successful show (as Matt Drudge offers the information links with some measure of commentary).
The reason Rush Limbaugh (conservative radio overall) has been so overwhelmingly successful is due to one very simple fact: mainstream media has become to politically tainted and biased, any scholar of facts -- armed with a public forum -- can strip that bias in an instant. Rush does it with such flair and accuracy, conservatives praise his viewpoints as gospel. How can that be?
Liberals and their left wing waterboys believe they possess a monopoly on media, so all the newly minted journalists, fresh from school, show up as enterprising, enthusiastic young apprentices, only to learn the only way their by-line makes print is to dance to the master's bidding. Ever hear a liberal say anything good about Limbaugh, Drudge, or Fox News?
I can trot out thousands of examples where liberal bias has been presented under the guise of legitimate news reporting. Informed and involved Americans see this fraud daily. When the editorial boards of major newspapers or electronic news outlets fashion their reporting so opponents of their political leanings come across as imbecilic, selfish, immoral, or criminal -- without facts to substantiate those charges -- the trust and integrity our founding fathers demanded (Second Amendment) is betrayed. Liberals have no qualms about betraying anything but liberalism, and this fact manifests itself in the reporting of most large circulation newspapers, television networks, and in the halls of academia. Sources that should provide unimpeachable information have been reduced to nothing more than liberal spin and distortion. This is undisputed, even by the same media outlets guilty of those contemptible practices. I certainly have no issues with liberals acquiring a free speech forum and using it as they see fit. Those liberals must, however, identify that forum as 1) news or 2) opinion. If they opt for #1, keep the facts straight, unbiased, fair, and accurate. If they select #2, well, we all know liberal opinion forums fold up like Cuban battleships (not many of those around). However, declaring themselves to be legitimate news organizations, wrapping themselves in cloak of the US Constitution, duty bound to be forthright and honorable, then a serious abuse and fraud has been committed. The left, in so many cases, has taken mass media into the gutters of liberal propaganda, forsaking the lessons history taught us about such dubious manipulations of news and information.
Just for the sake of clarity, imagine if every news story presented -- with the same zeal and emphasis displayed by these liberal idiots -- contained references to God or Jesus Christ. Example: "Today, in defiance of God's will and in spite of Jesus' suffering, Russians attacked strategic targets within the borders of Georgia, a God-fearing ally of the United States." (How many liberals do you think would sit still for that?) Liberal version: "Bush's failed policy leaves thousands dead, Russians on the march. McCain approves of Russian action, campaign reports".
So why must we sit still for the same nonsense, only spun their way?
Examine recent events surrounding the former US Senator from North Carolina, vice-presidential nominee, and candidate for President. So feckless and inept is this ambulance chasing lawyer, the notoriously corrupt Democratic Party rejected his effort. Throughout his career as a politician, the liberal press trumpeted this clown's virtue and devotion to their cause, ignoring the glaring weakness of his platform. Now, after years of tacit denial and scolding those that knew better, this buffoon has admitted to betraying the trust of his family and supporters -- only after a sordid tabloid captured him in a compromising situation. The reaction of the mainstream media was revealing -- and sickening to legitimate Americans. We all recall the utterly absurd attempts to smear President Bush and his family, Vice President Cheney and his family, Senator McCain, and a host of other conservative (Republican) officials without a solid fact in evidence. The mere suggestion of impropriety set off a barrage of editorial commentary and news reports. Yet, when leading Democrats are caught -- red handed -- in outright lies, fraud, or corruption, the stories are not tempered with disdain and disgust, but of how that Democrat somehow became a "victim" of an intolerant society dominated by sexually retarded white men. This, my fellow legitimate Americans, is more treasonous and despicable than the sordid acts themselves.
Liberals insist the saga of the former Arkansas governor and worst President of the 20th Century was tainted only by a single sex act. Only a mind numbed moron would suggest such a thing. The President of the United States stood before the nation and vehemently denied there was anything sexual going on, only to be exposed -- for the umpteenth time -- as a serial molester/rapist with a remarkable penchant for lying. What proved to be the deal breaker with this shyster was the commission of a felony -- lying under oath. Had this been George W. Bush -- caught red handed and proven a liar -- the media frenzy would compare only to the news Britney Spears hiked up her dress to show everyone she liked to go panty-less. The media has concocted and fabricated more phony stories about President Bush and his staff than Walt Disney could imagine, but where the truth lies about the former Arkansas governor and worst President of the 20th Century, an equally corrupt North Carolina lawyer/senator/vice-president nominee/candidate for President, no one seeking that truth from the mainstream media will never know the facts.
As we speak (write and read, as it were), Russian forces are engaged in a fierce assault against a friend of United States. Georgia is an independent nation, free of Soviet style oppression, yet entangled in a territorial dispute with the mighty Russians. Predictably, the liberal press has somehow determined this conflict was instigated by the failed policy of President Bush. Worst still, according to these left wing luminaries, thousands of lives are being lost in brutal fight in an effort to strengthen the campaign of Senator McCain. Legitimate Americans cannot tolerate this madness any longer. We'll delve into the serious nature of these disturbing events in Georgia as facts are established, but the focus today is on just how deep into the lunatic abyss the left wing press has fallen. Anyone believing President Bush or Senator McCain is buoyed by the fighting in Georgia is clinically insane -- I'd almost recommend they be put out of the misery, but why deny due process?
Friends and neighbors, you can play a big role in restoring integrity and honor to our national press apparatus. We can pick and choose those programs we know are purely opinion oriented, but we want to rely on established news (hard news) programming to present the facts, free of political bias or editorial influence. The question for the liberal morons making the case American Republicans are responsible for the fighting in Georgia should be this: where is the evidence the US President (or a sitting US senator) provoked either side into military action?
Demand an answer from anyone espousing that folly. Require details. You'll get none, but do it anyway. The blubbering, sputtering, juvenile response you'll most likely get should do nothing more than convince you our society needs fair and accurate news coverage -- the kind only so few outlets provide today. Of course, you can always get the correct spin right here -- Brother Paul and I would never lie to you.
Not on purpose, anyway.